Stride Benchmarks

Operators use Stride benchmarks to keep account data accurate for confident GTM, TAM analysis, and CRM updates - matching each task to the best-fit model, provider, and workflow. Double your outcomes. Halve the cost.

How often provider data matches validated company records.

#1

Stride

75%
#2

Clay (Argon)

67%
#3

GPT 5.4

64%
#4

ZoomInfo

49%
#5

Clay (Premium Data Providers)

43%
Segment
Overall
75%
67%
64%
49%
43%

Insights

We see stronger performance in the Footprint-Account-Impact benchmark than in the Accuracy benchmark because the two measures answer different questions. Accuracy measures the raw distance between a provider's value and the reference value. Account Impact measures whether that difference would actually change how a GTM team segments, prioritises, or treats the account.

This distinction matters because not every numerical error is commercially meaningful. For example, if a company has 4,000 employees and a provider reports 1,500, that would represent a large raw error and would likely fail an accuracy test. But if both values still place the company into the same enterprise treatment band, the account-level decision may remain unchanged. In that case, the provider is wrong in absolute terms but not necessarily wrong in a way that changes the GTM motion. This is why Account Impact is more forgiving, but also why it is often the more practical benchmark for evaluating whether data is decision-grade.

Want to see how Footprint maps your market?

Bring your CRM, warehouse, or enrichment source and we’ll show you where coverage is weak, where identity breaks down, and how a governed company universe can improve the decisions built on top of it.