Customer Stories
Case Study14 Apr 2026 · 3 min read

Driving an AI Leader's Global Expansion

We helped a leading AI company uncover the true enterprise opportunity across LATAM and MENA by mapping company revenue, paid marketing spend, and media mix to identify the highest-value accounts in each priority market.

Published
14 Apr 2026
Reading time
3 min read
Author
Stride
Category
Case Study

Net-new accounts

30%

of the highest-priority accounts were uncovered as effectively net new once local operating teams were tied back to the right financial structures.

Priority targets

Top 100

spenders identified in each priority country to give commercial teams a defensible ranked account view.

Vendor miss rate

50%+

of reviewed vendor revenue estimates were more than 2x the true value.

The goal

As a leading AI company expanded into emerging markets, it needed a more reliable view of where enterprise demand actually sat. The brief was clear: identify the top 100 spending companies in each priority country across LATAM and MENA, estimate their revenue, understand paid marketing investment, and map the relative share of wallet across the key partners in the region.

The data was far less clear than the brief. Commercial activity often sat in one market while the financial entity sat in another, which distorted traditional location mapping and obscured the real buying centre.

Existing vendors were also of limited use. Most offered little on marketing spend or media mix, and in more than 50% of the cases we reviewed, existing CRM enrichment providers revenue estimates were wrong more than 2x the true value. Given these were often large, publicly traded companies, this was particularly surprising.

Finding the Real Buying Centre

Legal structure can hide where buying power actually sits. Stride agents help reveal where budget and commercial activity are really concentrated.

ACCOUNTPlayrixCorporate HQ and legal entitypoint to IrelandParent companyRegional holdcoSubsidiariesLEGAL ENTITYIrelandBUYING CENTRE IDENTIFIEDCyprusRegional marketingRegional media buyingRemote teamsConcentrated industry location

Enrichment estimates more than 2x off

50%+

In more than half of the reviewed cases, existing CRM enrichment provider revenue estimates were wrong by more than 2x, which made ranked expansion planning hard to trust.

Approach

We used Stride's company universe to map the enterprise market across LATAM and MENA, then applied our revenue, paid marketing, entity resolution, and media mix agents across the full population to isolate the highest-priority enterprise targets in each country.

To improve reliability, we evaluated the outputs against known reference points using bespoke ML models, recalibrating the system through repeated testing. The result was a clearer, more decision-ready view of which companies were truly active in each market, where commercial opportunity was concentrated, and where the client's teams should focus first.

Ranked country board showing top enterprise spenders across LATAM and MENA.

Results

This materially changed the target universe. Approximately 30% of the highest-priority accounts were effectively net new, hidden by earlier location-entity mapping that failed to connect local operating teams with offshore financial structures.

The client could now prioritise the highest-value enterprise accounts with greater confidence, sharpen its view of the addressable market, and focus expansion effort where commercial potential was real, not merely visible on paper. We have changed identifying details, but the underlying results are real.

Conclusion

From fragmented signals to a ranked expansion plan

The case shows what changes when entity resolution, spend intelligence, and market context are treated as one problem rather than three separate datasets.

  • 30% of the highest-priority accounts emerged as effectively net new.
  • The top 100 spenders were identified in each priority country across LATAM and MENA.
  • Internal validation suggested roughly 80% accuracy on overall spend identification and 60% on partner-level media allocation.

Benchmarking vs Frontier Models

We benchmarked the work against deep research outputs from leading frontier models, including GPT Pro and Gemini Pro. Those tools were directionally useful, but in our internal validation they identified roughly 50% of the true top 100 companies by overall media spend and around 30% of partner-level media spend.

Our estimate for Stride's performance was materially stronger, at roughly 80% on overall spend identification and 60% on partner-level media allocation. That estimate should still be read with caution because it is based on internal validation.

The gap was most visible in B2B, manufacturing, and other traditional sectors, where general-purpose models tended to overestimate marketing spend and miss important accounts altogether.